Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c L. (((forall pfp_repeat_index_left_pad_zerozeros. (exists pfa_gap_left_pad_zerozerosindex. pfa_gap_left_pad_zerozerosindex + S (pfp_repeat_index_left_pad_zerozeros) = (0)) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_left_pad_zerozerosentry. ff_h_pfp_left_pad_zerozerosentry + S (0) = S ((S (pfp_repeat_index_left_pad_zerozeros)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_left_pad_zerozerosentry. b = ff_q_pfp_left_pad_zerozerosentry * S ((S (pfp_repeat_index_left_pad_zerozeros)) * c) + (0)))) /\ ((forall pfrep_index_left_pad_zero pfrep_value_left_pad_zero. (exists pfa_gap_left_pad_zerobound. pfa_gap_left_pad_zerobound + S (pfrep_index_left_pad_zero) = (L)) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_left_pad_zeroinput. ff_h_pfp_left_pad_zeroinput + S (pfrep_value_left_pad_zero) = S ((S (pfrep_index_left_pad_zero)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_left_pad_zeroinput. b = ff_q_pfp_left_pad_zeroinput * S ((S (pfrep_index_left_pad_zero)) * c) + (pfrep_value_left_pad_zero))) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_left_pad_zerooutput. ff_h_pfp_left_pad_zerooutput + S (pfrep_value_left_pad_zero) = S ((S ((0)+pfrep_index_left_pad_zero)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_left_pad_zerooutput. b = ff_q_pfp_left_pad_zerooutput * S ((S ((0)+pfrep_index_left_pad_zero)) * c) + (pfrep_value_left_pad_zero)))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Zero left padding uses the original code and changes no coefficient.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 19 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v33 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
matrix_rank_no_index_below_zero Alpha theorem; checked-use authorized zero_add Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Separate the logical casesL4–4
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L4
split
03Fix variables and assumptionsL5–6
04Separate the logical casesL7–7
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L7
exfalso
05Use earlier factsL8–10
06Fix variables and assumptionsL11–14
Original exact command ledger · 19 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro L - 0004
split - 0005
intro i - 0006
intro hi - 0007
exfalso - 0008
specialize matrix_rank_no_index_below_zero (i) - 0009
apply matrix_rank_no_index_below_zero - 0010
exact hi - 0011
intro i - 0012
intro a - 0013
intro hi - 0014
intro ha - 0015
have hindex : 0+i=i - 0016
apply zero_add - 0017
rewrite hindex - 0018
rewrite hindex - 0019
exact ha