Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Coefficients are highest-degree-first. The divisor has a nonzero decoded head; primality supplies its actual inverse. Empty quotients and remainders are included. Functionality compares the constructed execution lengths and decoded coefficients, never arbitrary beta codes. Formal polynomial equivalence compares every coefficient, not evaluations on a finite field. The formal identity and remainder-degree bound are proved separately, not assumed by the execution graph. Arbitrary quotient/remainder-pair uniqueness from a formal identity, multiplication associativity, gcd/Bezout, irreducible-polynomial existence, and the full G091 prime-power-field goal remain open. The seven displayed new names are conservative first-order notation, not new kernel primitives.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ d. ∀ e. ∀ L. ∀ k. ∀ a. BetaPrefixEqual(b,c,d,e,L) → PolynomialPowerCoefficient(b,c,L,k,a) → PolynomialPowerCoefficient(d,e,L,k,a)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 27 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–9
02Separate the logical casesL10–13
03Construct an explicit witnessL14–14
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L14
exists x
04Separate the logical casesL15–15
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L15
split
05Use earlier factsL16–25
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L16
exact ha_left_witness_left - L17
specialize he (x) - L18
specialize he (a) - L19
apply he - L20
specialize prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound (x) - L21
specialize prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound (k) - L22
specialize prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound (L) - L23
apply prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound - L24
exact ha_left_witness_left - L25
exact ha_left_witness_right
06Separate the logical casesL26–26
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L26
right
07Use earlier factsL27–27
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L27
exact ha_right
Original defined command ledger · 27 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro d - 0004
intro e - 0005
intro L - 0006
intro k - 0007
intro a - 0008
intro he - 0009
intro ha - 0010
cases ha - 0011
cases ha_left - 0012
cases ha_left_witness - 0013
left - 0014
exists x - 0015
split - 0016
exact ha_left_witness_left - 0017
specialize he (x) - 0018
specialize he (a) - 0019
apply he - 0020
specialize prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound (x) - 0021
specialize prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound (k) - 0022
specialize prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound (L) - 0023
apply prime_field_polynomial_power_index_bound - 0024
exact ha_left_witness_left - 0025
exact ha_left_witness_right - 0026
right - 0027
exact ha_right