Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
All coefficients retain the established highest-degree-first order. Trimming handles empty and all-zero prefixes; monic normalization requires a nonzero leading coefficient. Synthetic division has a nonempty input of length S n and a quotient of length n, unique in decoded values. Its coefficient recurrence, actual evaluation remainder and positive-degree drop are checked. General polynomial Euclidean division, gcd/Bezout, an arbitrary-convolution factor theorem, irreducible-polynomial existence and the full G091 prime-power-field endpoint remain open. These exact theorems are first admitted to Alpha v32; Stable remains unchanged.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ p. ∀ ab. ∀ ac. ∀ bb. ∀ bc. ∀ rb. ∀ rc. ∀ l. FpCoefficientSubtraction(p,ab,ac,bb,bc,rb,rc,l) → FpPolyAdd(p,bb,bc,rb,rc,ab,ac,l)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 31 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–11
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L11
intro hi
03Establish hvL12–15
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply h.
- L12
have hv : ∃ a. ∃ b. ∃ r. BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a) ∧ (BetaAt(bb,bc,i,b) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,i,r) ∧ FpAdd(p,b,r,a)))Definitions: BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a)BetaAt(bb,bc,i,b)BetaAt(rb,rc,i,r)FpAdd(p,b,r,a)Original native command in the exact edition - L13
specialize h (i) - L14
apply h - L15
exact hi
04Separate the logical casesL16–21
05Construct an explicit witnessL22–24
06Separate the logical casesL25–25
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L25
split
07Use earlier factsL26–26
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L26
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_left
08Separate the logical casesL27–27
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L27
split
09Use earlier factsL28–28
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L28
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right_left
10Separate the logical casesL29–29
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L29
split
Original defined command ledger · 31 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro ab - 0003
intro ac - 0004
intro bb - 0005
intro bc - 0006
intro rb - 0007
intro rc - 0008
intro l - 0009
intro h - 0010
intro i - 0011
intro hi - 0012
have hv : ∃ a. ∃ b. ∃ r. BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a) ∧ (BetaAt(bb,bc,i,b) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,i,r) ∧ FpAdd(p,b,r,a))) - 0013
specialize h (i) - 0014
apply h - 0015
exact hi - 0016
cases hv - 0017
cases hv_witness - 0018
cases hv_witness_witness - 0019
cases hv_witness_witness_witness - 0020
cases hv_witness_witness_witness_right - 0021
cases hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right - 0022
exists x1 - 0023
exists x2 - 0024
exists x - 0025
split - 0026
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_left - 0027
split - 0028
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right_left - 0029
split - 0030
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_left - 0031
exact hv_witness_witness_witness_right_right_right