Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
All coefficients retain the established highest-degree-first order. Trimming handles empty and all-zero prefixes; monic normalization requires a nonzero leading coefficient. Synthetic division has a nonempty input of length S n and a quotient of length n, unique in decoded values. Its coefficient recurrence, actual evaluation remainder and positive-degree drop are checked. General polynomial Euclidean division, gcd/Bezout, an arbitrary-convolution factor theorem, irreducible-polynomial existence and the full G091 prime-power-field endpoint remain open. These exact theorems are first admitted to Alpha v32; Stable remains unchanged.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ p. ∀ ab. ∀ ac. ∀ rb. ∀ rc. ∀ AB. ∀ AC. ∀ RB. ∀ RC. ∀ l. (∀ x. ∀ y. Lt(x,l) → BetaAt(ab,ac,x,y) → BetaAt(AB,AC,x,y)) → (∀ x. ∀ y. Lt(x,l) → BetaAt(rb,rc,x,y) → BetaAt(RB,RC,x,y)) → FpCoefficientNegation(p,ab,ac,rb,rc,l) → FpCoefficientNegation(p,AB,AC,RB,RC,l)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 38 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–15
03Establish hvL16–19
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply h.
- L16
have hv : ∃ a. ∃ r. BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,i,r) ∧ FpAdd(p,a,r,0))Definitions: BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a)BetaAt(rb,rc,i,r)FpAdd(p,a,r,0)Original native command in the exact edition - L17
specialize h (i) - L18
apply h - L19
exact hi
04Separate the logical casesL20–23
05Construct an explicit witnessL24–25
06Separate the logical casesL26–26
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L26
split
07Use earlier factsL27–31
08Separate the logical casesL32–32
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L32
split
Original defined command ledger · 38 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro ab - 0003
intro ac - 0004
intro rb - 0005
intro rc - 0006
intro AB - 0007
intro AC - 0008
intro RB - 0009
intro RC - 0010
intro l - 0011
intro h0 - 0012
intro h1 - 0013
intro h - 0014
intro i - 0015
intro hi - 0016
have hv : ∃ a. ∃ r. BetaAt(ab,ac,i,a) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,i,r) ∧ FpAdd(p,a,r,0)) - 0017
specialize h (i) - 0018
apply h - 0019
exact hi - 0020
cases hv - 0021
cases hv_witness - 0022
cases hv_witness_witness - 0023
cases hv_witness_witness_right - 0024
exists x - 0025
exists x1 - 0026
split - 0027
specialize h0 (i) - 0028
specialize h0 (x) - 0029
apply h0 - 0030
exact hi - 0031
exact hv_witness_witness_left - 0032
split - 0033
specialize h1 (i) - 0034
specialize h1 (x1) - 0035
apply h1 - 0036
exact hi - 0037
exact hv_witness_witness_right_left - 0038
exact hv_witness_witness_right_right