Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall p n. exists qb qc db dc. (((((exists ff_h_lmd_empty_initial. ff_h_lmd_empty_initial + S (n) = S ((S (0)) * qc)) /\ exists ff_q_lmd_empty_initial. qb = ff_q_lmd_empty_initial * S ((S (0)) * qc) + (n))) /\ forall lmd_index_empty. (exists lmd_gap_empty_index. lmd_gap_empty_index + S (lmd_index_empty) = (0)) -> exists lmd_current_empty lmd_successor_empty lmd_digit_empty. ((((exists ff_h_lmd_empty_current. ff_h_lmd_empty_current + S (lmd_current_empty) = S ((S (lmd_index_empty)) * qc)) /\ exists ff_q_lmd_empty_current. qb = ff_q_lmd_empty_current * S ((S (lmd_index_empty)) * qc) + (lmd_current_empty))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_lmd_empty_successor. ff_h_lmd_empty_successor + S (lmd_successor_empty) = S ((S (S lmd_index_empty)) * qc)) /\ exists ff_q_lmd_empty_successor. qb = ff_q_lmd_empty_successor * S ((S (S lmd_index_empty)) * qc) + (lmd_successor_empty))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_lmd_empty_digit. ff_h_lmd_empty_digit + S (lmd_digit_empty) = S ((S (lmd_index_empty)) * dc)) /\ exists ff_q_lmd_empty_digit. db = ff_q_lmd_empty_digit * S ((S (lmd_index_empty)) * dc) + (lmd_digit_empty))) /\ ((lmd_current_empty = (p) * (lmd_successor_empty) + (lmd_digit_empty)) /\ (exists lmd_gap_empty_digit_bound. lmd_gap_empty_digit_bound + S (lmd_digit_empty) = (p))))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
An actual initial quotient code and arbitrary empty digit code exist for every natural.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 11 exact native proof lines.
dependency-curried kernel-checked theorem body; Alpha enrollment and checked-use authority follow separately sealed release evidence; Stable membership remains unchanged
Historical empty-context replay experiment only; that experiment persisted no certificate and granted no release authority. Current checked use follows separately sealed, independently verified proof bundles; there is no Stable promotion.
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Use earlier factsL3–3
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L3
specialize lucas_digit_chain_initial_code_exists n
03Separate the logical casesL4–5
04Construct an explicit witnessL6–9
Original exact command ledger · 11 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro n - 0003
specialize lucas_digit_chain_initial_code_exists n - 0004
cases lucas_digit_chain_initial_code_exists - 0005
cases lucas_digit_chain_initial_code_exists_witness - 0006
exists x - 0007
exists x1 - 0008
exists 0 - 0009
exists 0 - 0010
apply lucas_digit_chain_empty - 0011
exact lucas_digit_chain_initial_code_exists_witness_witness