Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ p. ∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ l. Prime(p) → ∃ x. ∃ y. ∃ z. ∃ n. DivisionPrefix(p,b,c,x,y,z,n,l)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This reading surface never changes the unchanged intuitionistic kernel or confers checked-use authority.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
In local proof propositions
Exact expanded first-order statement
forall p b c l. ((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_lucas_prefix_prime frm_prime_right_lucas_prefix_prime. p = frm_prime_left_lucas_prefix_prime * frm_prime_right_lucas_prefix_prime -> frm_prime_left_lucas_prefix_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_lucas_prefix_prime = 1)) -> exists qb qc db dc. (forall fdp_index_lucas_digits. (exists gsp_lt_gap_lucas_digits_index_bound. gsp_lt_gap_lucas_digits_index_bound + S fdp_index_lucas_digits = l) -> exists fdp_value_lucas_digits fdp_quotient_lucas_digits fdp_remainder_lucas_digits. (((exists ff_h_fdp_lucas_digits_source. ff_h_fdp_lucas_digits_source + S (fdp_value_lucas_digits) = S ((S (fdp_index_lucas_digits)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_fdp_lucas_digits_source. b = ff_q_fdp_lucas_digits_source * S ((S (fdp_index_lucas_digits)) * c) + (fdp_value_lucas_digits))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_fdp_lucas_digits_quotient_entry. ff_h_fdp_lucas_digits_quotient_entry + S (fdp_quotient_lucas_digits) = S ((S (fdp_index_lucas_digits)) * qc)) /\ exists ff_q_fdp_lucas_digits_quotient_entry. qb = ff_q_fdp_lucas_digits_quotient_entry * S ((S (fdp_index_lucas_digits)) * qc) + (fdp_quotient_lucas_digits))) /\ ((((exists ff_h_fdp_lucas_digits_remainder_entry. ff_h_fdp_lucas_digits_remainder_entry + S (fdp_remainder_lucas_digits) = S ((S (fdp_index_lucas_digits)) * dc)) /\ exists ff_q_fdp_lucas_digits_remainder_entry. db = ff_q_fdp_lucas_digits_remainder_entry * S ((S (fdp_index_lucas_digits)) * dc) + (fdp_remainder_lucas_digits))) /\ (fdp_value_lucas_digits = p * fdp_quotient_lucas_digits + fdp_remainder_lucas_digits /\ (exists gsp_lt_gap_lucas_digits_remainder_bound. gsp_lt_gap_lucas_digits_remainder_bound + S fdp_remainder_lucas_digits = p)))))Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
LU000A lucas_base_p_digit_prefix_existsDirect theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only propositions whose conservative expansion has been checked for exact first-order equivalence are compacted. Every changed line retains its immutable exact replay command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Use earlier factsL6–10
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
03Fix variables and assumptionsL11–11
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L11
intro hzero
Original defined command ledger · 15 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro hprime - 0006
specialize lucas_base_p_digit_prefix_exists p - 0007
specialize lucas_base_p_digit_prefix_exists b - 0008
specialize lucas_base_p_digit_prefix_exists c - 0009
specialize lucas_base_p_digit_prefix_exists l - 0010
apply lucas_base_p_digit_prefix_exists - 0011
intro hzero - 0012
specialize prime_nonzero p - 0013
apply prime_nonzero - 0014
exact hprime - 0015
exact hzero