Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ d. ∀ a. ∀ b. ∀ q. ∀ r. ∀ s. ∀ t. ∀ Q. ∀ R. DivRem(a,d,q,r) → DivRem(b,d,s,t) → DivRem(a + b,d,Q,R) → Le(q + s,Q)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This reading surface never changes the unchanged intuitionistic kernel or confers checked-use authority.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
In local proof propositions
Exact expanded first-order statement
forall d a b q r s t Q R. (((a) = (d) * (q) + (r) /\ (exists bcf_lt_gap_kmvadqb_left_bound. bcf_lt_gap_kmvadqb_left_bound + S (r) = d))) -> (((b) = (d) * (s) + (t) /\ (exists bcf_lt_gap_kmvadqb_right_bound. bcf_lt_gap_kmvadqb_right_bound + S (t) = d))) -> (((a + b) = (d) * (Q) + (R) /\ (exists bcf_lt_gap_kmvadqb_total_bound. bcf_lt_gap_kmvadqb_total_bound + S (R) = d))) -> (exists bcf_le_gap_kmvadql_result. bcf_le_gap_kmvadql_result + (q + s) = Q)Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only propositions whose conservative expansion has been checked for exact first-order equivalence are compacted. Every changed line retains its immutable exact replay command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–12
03Use earlier factsL13–21
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L13
specialize division_add_quotient_bit d - L14
specialize division_add_quotient_bit a - L15
specialize division_add_quotient_bit b - L16
specialize division_add_quotient_bit q - L17
specialize division_add_quotient_bit r - L18
specialize division_add_quotient_bit s - L19
specialize division_add_quotient_bit t - L20
specialize division_add_quotient_bit Q - L21
specialize division_add_quotient_bit R
04Establish hbitL22–26
05Separate the logical casesL27–27
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L27
cases hbit
06Calculate and transport equalitiesL28–28
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L28
rewrite hbit_left
07Use earlier factsL29–30
08Calculate and transport equalitiesL31–31
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L31
rewrite hbit_right
Original defined command ledger · 36 lines
- 0001
intro d - 0002
intro a - 0003
intro b - 0004
intro q - 0005
intro r - 0006
intro s - 0007
intro t - 0008
intro Q - 0009
intro R - 0010
intro hleft - 0011
intro hright - 0012
intro htotal - 0013
specialize division_add_quotient_bit d - 0014
specialize division_add_quotient_bit a - 0015
specialize division_add_quotient_bit b - 0016
specialize division_add_quotient_bit q - 0017
specialize division_add_quotient_bit r - 0018
specialize division_add_quotient_bit s - 0019
specialize division_add_quotient_bit t - 0020
specialize division_add_quotient_bit Q - 0021
specialize division_add_quotient_bit R - 0022
have hbit : Q = q + s \/ Q = S (q + s) - 0023
apply division_add_quotient_bit - 0024
exact hleft - 0025
exact hright - 0026
exact htotal - 0027
cases hbit - 0028
rewrite hbit_left - 0029
specialize le_refl (q + s) - 0030
exact le_refl - 0031
rewrite hbit_right - 0032
specialize le_succ (q + s) - 0033
specialize le_succ (q + s) - 0034
apply le_succ - 0035
specialize le_refl (q + s) - 0036
exact le_refl