Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c d e k i a. (forall jt_index_entryequal jt_left_entryequal jt_right_entryequal. (exists jt_gap_entryequalindex. jt_gap_entryequalindex+S (jt_index_entryequal)=(k)) -> (((exists fs_h_jt_entryequalleft. fs_h_jt_entryequalleft + S (jt_left_entryequal) = S ((S (jt_index_entryequal)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_jt_entryequalleft. b = fs_q_jt_entryequalleft * S ((S (jt_index_entryequal)) * c) + (jt_left_entryequal))) -> (((exists fs_h_jt_entryequalright. fs_h_jt_entryequalright + S (jt_right_entryequal) = S ((S (jt_index_entryequal)) * e)) /\ exists fs_q_jt_entryequalright. d = fs_q_jt_entryequalright * S ((S (jt_index_entryequal)) * e) + (jt_right_entryequal))) -> jt_left_entryequal=jt_right_entryequal) -> (exists jt_gap_entryindex. jt_gap_entryindex+S (i)=(k)) -> (((exists fs_h_jt_entrysource. fs_h_jt_entrysource + S (a) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_jt_entrysource. b = fs_q_jt_entrysource * S ((S (i)) * c) + (a))) -> (((exists fs_h_jt_entrytarget. fs_h_jt_entrytarget + S (a) = S ((S (i)) * e)) /\ exists fs_q_jt_entrytarget. d = fs_q_jt_entrytarget * S ((S (i)) * e) + (a)))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Coordinate equality transports an actual beta entry with unchanged value.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 27 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v35 checked-use · first admitted v35 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
beta_at_exists Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Establish hzL11–15
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta at exists.
03Separate the logical casesL16–16
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L16
cases hz
04Establish heqL17–26
05Use earlier factsL27–27
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L27
exact hz_witness
Original exact command ledger · 27 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro d - 0004
intro e - 0005
intro k - 0006
intro i - 0007
intro a - 0008
intro h - 0009
intro hi - 0010
intro ha - 0011
have hz : exists z. ((exists fs_h_jt_equalentry. fs_h_jt_equalentry + S (z) = S ((S (i)) * e)) /\ exists fs_q_jt_equalentry. d = fs_q_jt_equalentry * S ((S (i)) * e) + (z)) - 0012
specialize beta_at_exists (d) - 0013
specialize beta_at_exists (e) - 0014
specialize beta_at_exists (i) - 0015
apply beta_at_exists - 0016
cases hz - 0017
have heq : a=x - 0018
specialize h (i) - 0019
specialize h (a) - 0020
specialize h (x) - 0021
apply h - 0022
exact hi - 0023
exact ha - 0024
exact hz_witness - 0025
rewrite heq - 0026
rewrite heq - 0027
exact hz_witness