95 new Alpha admissions come from 96 source lemmas: tuple equality reflexivity reuses an already-admitted theorem and is not counted twice. All counts use actual finite beta-coded enumerations. G008 multiplicativity is proved; the general prime-power count and distinct-prime product formula are further goals. General prime-power fields (G091) remain open. Stable is unchanged.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ k. ∀ n. ∀ c. ∀ B. ∀ C. ∀ D. ∀ E. JordanTupleScan(k,n,c,0,B,C,D,E,0)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 47 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–7
02Separate the logical casesL8–8
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L8
split
03Fix variables and assumptionsL9–10
04Separate the logical casesL11–11
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L11
exfalso
05Use earlier factsL12–17
06Separate the logical casesL18–18
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L18
split
07Fix variables and assumptionsL19–28
08Fix variables and assumptionsL29–29
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L29
intro heq
09Separate the logical casesL30–30
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L30
exfalso
10Use earlier factsL31–36
11Fix variables and assumptionsL37–40
12Separate the logical casesL41–41
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L41
exfalso
Original defined command ledger · 47 lines
- 0001
intro k - 0002
intro n - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro B - 0005
intro C - 0006
intro D - 0007
intro E - 0008
split - 0009
intro i - 0010
intro hi - 0011
exfalso - 0012
specialize lt_not_le (i) - 0013
specialize lt_not_le (0) - 0014
apply lt_not_le - 0015
exact hi - 0016
specialize zero_le (i) - 0017
apply zero_le - 0018
split - 0019
intro i - 0020
intro h - 0021
intro b - 0022
intro e - 0023
intro d - 0024
intro f - 0025
intro hi - 0026
intro hh - 0027
intro he - 0028
intro hf - 0029
intro heq - 0030
exfalso - 0031
specialize lt_not_le (i) - 0032
specialize lt_not_le (0) - 0033
apply lt_not_le - 0034
exact hi - 0035
specialize zero_le (i) - 0036
apply zero_le - 0037
intro z - 0038
intro hz - 0039
intro hb - 0040
intro hp - 0041
exfalso - 0042
specialize lt_not_le (z) - 0043
specialize lt_not_le (0) - 0044
apply lt_not_le - 0045
exact hz - 0046
specialize zero_le (z) - 0047
apply zero_le