Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall j K. (exists mdr_gap_successor_bound. mdr_gap_successor_bound + (j) = (S K)) -> j = S K \/ (exists mdr_gap_previous_bound. mdr_gap_previous_bound + (j) = (K))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
A natural number bounded by a successor is either that successor or is bounded by its predecessor.
The unchanged tactic script uses 3 declared prerequisites and contains 21 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v27 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
succ_le_succ Stable theorem; checked-use authorized finite_lt_succ_eq_or_lt Stable theorem; checked-use authorized le_of_succ_le_succ Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Establish hstrictL4–8
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply succ le succ.
03Establish hcaseL9–13
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply finite lt succ eq or lt.
04Separate the logical casesL14–15
05Use earlier factsL16–16
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L16
exact hcase_left
06Separate the logical casesL17–17
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L17
right
Original exact command ledger · 21 lines
- 0001
intro j - 0002
intro K - 0003
intro hj - 0004
have hstrict : exists mdr_gap_strict_successor. mdr_gap_strict_successor + S (j) = (S (S K)) - 0005
specialize succ_le_succ (j) - 0006
specialize succ_le_succ (S K) - 0007
apply succ_le_succ - 0008
exact hj - 0009
have hcase : j = S K \/ (exists mdr_gap_previous_strict. mdr_gap_previous_strict + S (j) = (S K)) - 0010
specialize finite_lt_succ_eq_or_lt (S K) - 0011
specialize finite_lt_succ_eq_or_lt (j) - 0012
apply finite_lt_succ_eq_or_lt - 0013
exact hstrict - 0014
cases hcase - 0015
left - 0016
exact hcase_left - 0017
right - 0018
specialize le_of_succ_le_succ (j) - 0019
specialize le_of_succ_le_succ (K) - 0020
apply le_of_succ_le_succ - 0021
exact hcase_right