Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
This branch proves the finite determinant/rank/span substrate. It does not claim Smith or Hermite normal form, lattice index equals determinant, determinant multiplicativity, lattice reduction, or geometry-of-numbers theorems.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ w. ∀ rb. ∀ rc. ∀ cb. ∀ cc. ∀ q. ∀ u. ∀ v. ∀ i. ∀ a. (∀ x. Lt(x,q · q) → ∃ y. (∃ z. ∃ n. ∃ m. ∃ k. x = q · z + n ∧ (Lt(n,q) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,z,m) ∧ (BetaAt(cb,cc,n,k) ∧ BetaAt(b,c,m · w + k,y))))) ∧ BetaAt(u,v,x,y)) → Lt(i,q · q) → BetaAt(u,v,i,a) → ∃ x. ∃ y. ∃ z. ∃ n. i = q · x + y ∧ (Lt(y,q) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,x,z) ∧ (BetaAt(cb,cc,y,n) ∧ BetaAt(b,c,z · w + n,a))))
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 33 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–15
03Establish hentryL16–19
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hprefix.
- L16
have hentry : ∃ z. (∃ x. ∃ y. ∃ n. ∃ m. i = q · x + y ∧ (Lt(y,q) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,x,n) ∧ (BetaAt(cb,cc,y,m) ∧ BetaAt(b,c,n · w + m,z))))) ∧ BetaAt(u,v,i,z)Definitions: Lt(y,q)BetaAt(rb,rc,x,n)BetaAt(cb,cc,y,m)BetaAt(b,c,n · w + m,z)BetaAt(u,v,i,z)Original native command in the exact edition - L17
specialize hprefix (i) - L18
apply hprefix - L19
exact hi
04Separate the logical casesL20–21
05Establish hvalueL22–31
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta at unique.
06Calculate and transport equalitiesL32–32
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L32
rewrite hvalue
07Use earlier factsL33–33
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L33
exact hentry_witness_left
Original defined command ledger · 33 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro w - 0004
intro rb - 0005
intro rc - 0006
intro cb - 0007
intro cc - 0008
intro q - 0009
intro u - 0010
intro v - 0011
intro i - 0012
intro a - 0013
intro hprefix - 0014
intro hi - 0015
intro ha - 0016
have hentry : ∃ z. (∃ x. ∃ y. ∃ n. ∃ m. i = q · x + y ∧ (Lt(y,q) ∧ (BetaAt(rb,rc,x,n) ∧ (BetaAt(cb,cc,y,m) ∧ BetaAt(b,c,n · w + m,z))))) ∧ BetaAt(u,v,i,z) - 0017
specialize hprefix (i) - 0018
apply hprefix - 0019
exact hi - 0020
cases hentry - 0021
cases hentry_witness - 0022
have hvalue : a = x - 0023
specialize beta_at_unique (u) - 0024
specialize beta_at_unique (v) - 0025
specialize beta_at_unique (i) - 0026
specialize beta_at_unique (a) - 0027
specialize beta_at_unique (x) - 0028
apply beta_at_unique - 0029
exact ha - 0030
exact hentry_witness_right - 0031
rewrite hvalue - 0032
rewrite hvalue - 0033
exact hentry_witness_left