Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
The derivative-nonzero criterion supplies no inverse or power witness: both are constructed. Roots may be arbitrary natural representatives of signed integer polynomials. Singular-root classification and p-adic completion are separate milestones.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ p. ∀ M. ∀ h. ∀ dp. ∀ dn. ∀ dg. M = S h → Dvd(p,M) → dg = dp + h · dn → SignedDerivativeUnit(p,dp,dn) → Coprime(dg,p)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 38 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Separate the logical casesL11–12
03Establish hproductL13–19
04Establish hiffL20–29
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hensel signed blend mod iff.
- L20
have hiff : (ModEq(p,dg · x,1) → ModEq(p,dp · x,1 + dn · x)) ∧ (ModEq(p,dp · x,1 + dn · x) → ModEq(p,dg · x,1))Definitions: ModEq(p,dg · x,1)ModEq(p,dp · x,1 + dn · x)Original native command in the exact edition - L21
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff p - L22
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff M - L23
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff h - L24
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff (dp * x) - L25
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff (dn * x) - L26
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff (dg * x) - L27
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff 1 - L28
apply hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff - L29
exact hM
05Use earlier factsL30–31
06Separate the logical casesL32–32
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L32
cases hiff
07Use earlier factsL33–38
Original defined command ledger · 38 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro M - 0003
intro h - 0004
intro dp - 0005
intro dn - 0006
intro dg - 0007
intro hM - 0008
intro hdiv - 0009
intro hdg - 0010
intro hunit - 0011
cases hunit - 0012
cases hunit_witness - 0013
have hproduct : dg * x = dp * x + h * (dn * x) - 0014
rewrite hdg - 0015
trans dp * x + (h * dn) * x - 0016
apply add_mul - 0017
congr - 0018
refl - 0019
apply mul_assoc - 0020
have hiff : (ModEq(p,dg · x,1) → ModEq(p,dp · x,1 + dn · x)) ∧ (ModEq(p,dp · x,1 + dn · x) → ModEq(p,dg · x,1)) - 0021
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff p - 0022
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff M - 0023
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff h - 0024
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff (dp * x) - 0025
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff (dn * x) - 0026
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff (dg * x) - 0027
specialize hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff 1 - 0028
apply hensel_signed_blend_mod_iff - 0029
exact hM - 0030
exact hdiv - 0031
exact hproduct - 0032
cases hiff - 0033
specialize mod_inverse_implies_coprime dg - 0034
specialize mod_inverse_implies_coprime p - 0035
specialize mod_inverse_implies_coprime x - 0036
apply mod_inverse_implies_coprime - 0037
apply hiff_right - 0038
exact hunit_witness_right