FS003F

four_square_prime_modular_seed_multiple

Alpha v34 independently verified · alpha_closed; checked-use authorized; not Stable

Any witnessed solution of x² + y² + 1 = p·k gives an actual four-square representation of the prime multiple.

Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.

Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement

forall p x y k. x * x + y * y + 1 = p * k -> (exists fsl_a_seed_multiple fsl_b_seed_multiple fsl_c_seed_multiple fsl_d_seed_multiple. (p * k) = fsl_a_seed_multiple * fsl_a_seed_multiple + fsl_b_seed_multiple * fsl_b_seed_multiple + fsl_c_seed_multiple * fsl_c_seed_multiple + fsl_d_seed_multiple * fsl_d_seed_multiple)

Constructive proof overview

Generated structural guide

Any witnessed solution of x² + y² + 1 = p·k gives an actual four-square representation of the prime multiple.

The unchanged tactic script uses 0 declared prerequisites and contains 11 exact native proof lines.

dependency-curried kernel-checked theorem body; Alpha enrollment and checked-use authority follow separately sealed release evidence; Stable membership remains unchanged

Historical empty-context replay experiment only; that experiment persisted no certificate and granted no release authority. Current checked use follows separately sealed, independently verified proof bundles; there is no Stable promotion.

Proof neighborhood

Direct dependencies

none

Direct dependents

Formal native tactic body

Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.

Read the argument

Proof checkpoints

11 script commands · 3 reading checkpoints · 0 local claims

This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.

01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5

Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.

  1. L1
    intro p
  2. L2
    intro x
  3. L3
    intro y
  4. L4
    intro k
  5. L5
    intro hseed
02Construct an explicit witnessL6–9

Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.

  1. L6
    exists x
  2. L7
    exists y
  3. L8
    exists 1
  4. L9
    exists 0
03Calculate and transport equalitiesL10–11

Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.

  1. L10
    rewrite <- hseed
  2. L11
    simp

Library-wide reading audit

Original exact command ledger · 11 lines
  1. 0001intro p
  2. 0002intro x
  3. 0003intro y
  4. 0004intro k
  5. 0005intro hseed
  6. 0006exists x
  7. 0007exists y
  8. 0008exists 1
  9. 0009exists 0
  10. 0010rewrite <- hseed
  11. 0011simp