Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall p. ((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_fsbs_prime frm_prime_right_fsbs_prime. p = frm_prime_left_fsbs_prime * frm_prime_right_fsbs_prime -> frm_prime_left_fsbs_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_fsbs_prime = 1)) -> (exists fsbs_a_prime_bounded fsbs_b_prime_bounded fsbs_k_prime_bounded. ((fsbs_a_prime_bounded * fsbs_a_prime_bounded + fsbs_b_prime_bounded * fsbs_b_prime_bounded + 1 = p * fsbs_k_prime_bounded) /\ (exists fsbs_lt_gap_prime_bounded_multiplier. fsbs_lt_gap_prime_bounded_multiplier + S (fsbs_k_prime_bounded) = (p))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Every prime, including two, has actual witnesses a²+b²+1=p·k with the constructive strict bound k<p.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 20 exact native proof lines.
dependency-curried kernel-checked theorem body; Alpha enrollment and checked-use authority follow separately sealed release evidence; Stable membership remains unchanged
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
eq_decidable Stable theorem; checked-use authorized FS000O four_square_non_two_prime_bounded_modular_seedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Establish hcaseL3–6
03Separate the logical casesL7–7
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L7
cases hcase
04Calculate and transport equalitiesL8–9
05Construct an explicit witnessL10–12
06Separate the logical casesL13–13
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L13
split
07Calculate and transport equalitiesL14–14
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L14
norm_num
08Construct an explicit witnessL15–15
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L15
exists 0
09Calculate and transport equalitiesL16–16
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L16
norm_num
Original exact command ledger · 20 lines
- 0001
intro p - 0002
intro hprime - 0003
have hcase : p = 2 \/ ~(p = 2) - 0004
specialize eq_decidable p - 0005
specialize eq_decidable 2 - 0006
exact eq_decidable - 0007
cases hcase - 0008
rewrite hcase_left - 0009
rewrite hcase_left - 0010
exists 1 - 0011
exists 0 - 0012
exists 1 - 0013
split - 0014
norm_num - 0015
exists 0 - 0016
norm_num - 0017
specialize four_square_non_two_prime_bounded_modular_seed p - 0018
apply four_square_non_two_prime_bounded_modular_seed - 0019
exact hprime - 0020
exact hcase_right