Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ p. ∀ h. p = 2 · h + 1 → Lt(h + h,p)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This reading surface never changes the unchanged intuitionistic kernel or confers checked-use authority.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
In local proof propositions
Exact expanded first-order statement
forall p h. p = 2 * h + 1 -> (exists fsri_gap_double. fsri_gap_double + S (h + h) = (p))Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only propositions whose conservative expansion has been checked for exact first-order equivalence are compacted. Every changed line retains its immutable exact replay command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Calculate and transport equalitiesL4–4
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L4
rewrite hodd
03Construct an explicit witnessL5–5
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L5
exists 0
04Calculate and transport equalitiesL6–6
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L6
simp [mul_succ_left, mul_zero_left, zero_add, add_succ_left, add_assoc]