Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ k. ∀ r. ∀ z. k · r = z → Lt(z,k · k) → Lt(r,k)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. This reading surface never changes the unchanged intuitionistic kernel or confers checked-use authority.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
In local proof propositions
Exact expanded first-order statement
forall k r z. k * r = z -> (exists gap. gap + S z = k * k) -> exists gap. gap + S r = kProof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only propositions whose conservative expansion has been checked for exact first-order equivalence are compacted. Every changed line retains its immutable exact replay command.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Use earlier factsL6–7
03Separate the logical casesL8–9
04Establish hscaledL10–19
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply mul le mul left.
- L10
have hscaled : Le(k · k,k · r)Definitions: Le(k · k,k · r)Original native command in the exact edition - L11
specialize mul_le_mul_left k - L12
specialize mul_le_mul_left r - L13
specialize mul_le_mul_left k - L14
apply mul_le_mul_left - L15
exact le_or_lt_left - L16
rewrite hnorm at hscaled - L17
specialize lt_not_le z - L18
specialize lt_not_le (k * k) - L19
apply lt_not_le
Original defined command ledger · 22 lines
- 0001
intro k - 0002
intro r - 0003
intro z - 0004
intro hnorm - 0005
intro hbound - 0006
specialize le_or_lt k - 0007
specialize le_or_lt r - 0008
cases le_or_lt - 0009
exfalso - 0010
have hscaled : Le(k · k,k · r)Exact native replay line
have hscaled : exists t. t + k * k = k * r - 0011
specialize mul_le_mul_left k - 0012
specialize mul_le_mul_left r - 0013
specialize mul_le_mul_left k - 0014
apply mul_le_mul_left - 0015
exact le_or_lt_left - 0016
rewrite hnorm at hscaled - 0017
specialize lt_not_le z - 0018
specialize lt_not_le (k * k) - 0019
apply lt_not_le - 0020
exact hbound - 0021
exact hscaled - 0022
exact le_or_lt_right