Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall m b c. (forall eu_factor_index_factors_empty. (exists eut_gap_eu_factors_empty_index. eut_gap_eu_factors_empty_index + S (eu_factor_index_factors_empty) = (0)) -> exists eu_factor_value_factors_empty. (((exists fs_h_eu_factors_empty_at. fs_h_eu_factors_empty_at + S (eu_factor_value_factors_empty) = S ((S (eu_factor_index_factors_empty)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_eu_factors_empty_at. b = fs_q_eu_factors_empty_at * S ((S (eu_factor_index_factors_empty)) * c) + (eu_factor_value_factors_empty))) /\ ((((forall eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime. (exists eut_left_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime. (eu_factor_index_factors_empty) = eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime * eut_left_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime * eut_right_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime) -> eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime = 1) /\ (eu_factor_value_factors_empty)=(eu_factor_index_factors_empty)) \/ (~(forall eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime. (exists eut_left_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime. (eu_factor_index_factors_empty) = eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime * eut_left_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime * eut_right_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime) -> eut_divisor_eu_factors_empty_choice_coprime = 1) /\ (eu_factor_value_factors_empty)=1))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
The empty weighted-factor prefix is valid for any beta codes.
The unchanged tactic script uses 2 declared prerequisites and contains 12 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v31 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
lt_not_le Stable theorem; checked-use authorized zero_le Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Separate the logical casesL6–6
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L6
exfalso