Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall m i. exists v. ((((forall eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime. (exists eut_left_eu_factor_exists_coprime. (i) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime * eut_left_eu_factor_exists_coprime) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factor_exists_coprime. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime * eut_right_eu_factor_exists_coprime) -> eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime = 1) /\ (v)=(i)) \/ (~(forall eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime. (exists eut_left_eu_factor_exists_coprime. (i) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime * eut_left_eu_factor_exists_coprime) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factor_exists_coprime. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime * eut_right_eu_factor_exists_coprime) -> eut_divisor_eu_factor_exists_coprime = 1) /\ (v)=1)))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Construct the actual weighted factor by the independent decidable coprimality predicate.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 17 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v31 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
totient_coprime_decidable Alpha theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Establish hcL3–6
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply totient coprime decidable.
- L3
have hc : (forall eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes. (exists eut_left_eu_factor_yes. (i) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes * eut_left_eu_factor_yes) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factor_yes. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes * eut_right_eu_factor_yes) -> eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes = 1) \/ ~(forall eut_divisor_eu_factor_no. (exists eut_left_eu_factor_no. (i) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_no * eut_left_eu_factor_no) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factor_no. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_no * eut_right_eu_factor_no) -> eut_divisor_eu_factor_no = 1) - L4
specialize totient_coprime_decidable (i) - L5
specialize totient_coprime_decidable (m) - L6
apply totient_coprime_decidable
03Separate the logical casesL7–7
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L7
cases hc
04Construct an explicit witnessL8–8
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L8
exists i
05Separate the logical casesL9–10
06Use earlier factsL11–11
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L11
exact hc_left
07Calculate and transport equalitiesL12–12
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L12
refl
08Construct an explicit witnessL13–13
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L13
exists 1
09Separate the logical casesL14–15
10Use earlier factsL16–16
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L16
exact hc_right
11Calculate and transport equalitiesL17–17
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L17
refl
Original exact command ledger · 17 lines
- 0001
intro m - 0002
intro i - 0003
have hc : (forall eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes. (exists eut_left_eu_factor_yes. (i) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes * eut_left_eu_factor_yes) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factor_yes. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes * eut_right_eu_factor_yes) -> eut_divisor_eu_factor_yes = 1) \/ ~(forall eut_divisor_eu_factor_no. (exists eut_left_eu_factor_no. (i) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_no * eut_left_eu_factor_no) -> (exists eut_right_eu_factor_no. (m) = eut_divisor_eu_factor_no * eut_right_eu_factor_no) -> eut_divisor_eu_factor_no = 1) - 0004
specialize totient_coprime_decidable (i) - 0005
specialize totient_coprime_decidable (m) - 0006
apply totient_coprime_decidable - 0007
cases hc - 0008
exists i - 0009
left - 0010
split - 0011
exact hc_left - 0012
refl - 0013
exists 1 - 0014
right - 0015
split - 0016
exact hc_right - 0017
refl