Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
The exact G014 theorem covers m>1 and genuinely invertible a. Phi counts coprime residues independently of the conclusion. The broader coprime theorem handles m=1 by congruence, not by asserting that one is a canonical remainder. Multiplicative-order and RSA statements are not claimed.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ a. ∀ m. ∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ d. ∀ e. ∀ l. UnitScaledPrefix(a,m,b,c,d,e,S l) → UnitScaledPrefix(a,m,b,c,d,e,l)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 24 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–10
02Fix variables and assumptionsL11–14
Original defined command ledger · 24 lines
- 0001
intro a - 0002
intro m - 0003
intro b - 0004
intro c - 0005
intro d - 0006
intro e - 0007
intro l - 0008
intro h - 0009
intro i - 0010
intro u - 0011
intro v - 0012
intro hi - 0013
intro hu - 0014
intro hv - 0015
specialize h (i) - 0016
specialize h (u) - 0017
specialize h (v) - 0018
apply h - 0019
specialize le_succ (S i) - 0020
specialize le_succ (l) - 0021
apply le_succ - 0022
exact hi - 0023
exact hu - 0024
exact hv