Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall n b c l i q. (forall dvi_index_lookup_prefix. (exists pvs_gap_lookup_prefixdomain. pvs_gap_lookup_prefixdomain + S (dvi_index_lookup_prefix) = (l)) -> exists dvi_value_lookup_prefix. ((((exists ff_h_pvs_lookup_prefixentry. ff_h_pvs_lookup_prefixentry + S (dvi_value_lookup_prefix) = S ((S (dvi_index_lookup_prefix)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_lookup_prefixentry. b = ff_q_pvs_lookup_prefixentry * S ((S (dvi_index_lookup_prefix)) * c) + (dvi_value_lookup_prefix))) /\ ((((~((dvi_index_lookup_prefix)=0)) /\ ((n)=(dvi_index_lookup_prefix)*(dvi_value_lookup_prefix)))) \/ ((((dvi_index_lookup_prefix)=0 \/ ~(exists pvs_factor_lookup_prefixgraphnondivisor. (n) = (dvi_index_lookup_prefix) * pvs_factor_lookup_prefixgraphnondivisor)) /\ ((dvi_value_lookup_prefix)=(dvi_index_lookup_prefix))))))) -> (exists pvs_gap_lookup_index. pvs_gap_lookup_index + S (i) = (l)) -> (((exists ff_h_pvs_lookup_beta. ff_h_pvs_lookup_beta + S (q) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_lookup_beta. b = ff_q_pvs_lookup_beta * S ((S (i)) * c) + (q))) -> ((((~((i)=0)) /\ ((n)=(i)*(q)))) \/ ((((i)=0 \/ ~(exists pvs_factor_lookup_resultnondivisor. (n) = (i) * pvs_factor_lookup_resultnondivisor)) /\ ((q)=(i)))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Every actual beta lookup in the constructed finite window has the literal complementary-divisor graph.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 27 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v31 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
beta_at_unique Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–9
02Establish hvL10–13
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hp.
- L10
have hv : exists v. (((((exists ff_h_pvs_lookup_entry. ff_h_pvs_lookup_entry + S (v) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_lookup_entry. b = ff_q_pvs_lookup_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (v))) /\ ((((~((i)=0)) /\ ((n)=(i)*(v)))) \/ ((((i)=0 \/ ~(exists pvs_factor_lookup_graphnondivisor. (n) = (i) * pvs_factor_lookup_graphnondivisor)) /\ ((v)=(i))))))) - L11
specialize hp (i) - L12
apply hp - L13
exact hi
03Separate the logical casesL14–15
04Establish heqL16–25
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta at unique.
05Calculate and transport equalitiesL26–26
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L26
rewrite heq
06Use earlier factsL27–27
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L27
exact hv_witness_right
Original exact command ledger · 27 lines
- 0001
intro n - 0002
intro b - 0003
intro c - 0004
intro l - 0005
intro i - 0006
intro q - 0007
intro hp - 0008
intro hi - 0009
intro hat - 0010
have hv : exists v. (((((exists ff_h_pvs_lookup_entry. ff_h_pvs_lookup_entry + S (v) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_lookup_entry. b = ff_q_pvs_lookup_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (v))) /\ ((((~((i)=0)) /\ ((n)=(i)*(v)))) \/ ((((i)=0 \/ ~(exists pvs_factor_lookup_graphnondivisor. (n) = (i) * pvs_factor_lookup_graphnondivisor)) /\ ((v)=(i))))))) - 0011
specialize hp (i) - 0012
apply hp - 0013
exact hi - 0014
cases hv - 0015
cases hv_witness - 0016
have heq : q=x - 0017
specialize beta_at_unique (b) - 0018
specialize beta_at_unique (c) - 0019
specialize beta_at_unique (i) - 0020
specialize beta_at_unique (q) - 0021
specialize beta_at_unique (x) - 0022
apply beta_at_unique - 0023
exact hat - 0024
exact hv_witness_left - 0025
rewrite heq - 0026
rewrite heq - 0027
exact hv_witness_right