Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall N F. (exists dst_positive_code_extract_table dst_positive_scale_extract_table dst_negative_code_extract_table dst_negative_scale_extract_table. (((F) = (((((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_positive_scale_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table))) + (((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)))) * S ((((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_positive_code_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_positive_scale_extract_table) + (dst_positive_scale_extract_table))) + (((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)))) + ((((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table))) + (((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) * S ((dst_negative_code_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) + ((dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_scale_extract_table)))))) /\ (forall dst_index_extract_table. (exists pvs_le_gap_extract_tabledomain. pvs_le_gap_extract_tabledomain + (dst_index_extract_table) = (N)) -> exists dst_positive_extract_table dst_negative_extract_table dst_value_extract_table. ((((exists ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive. ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive + S (dst_positive_extract_table) = S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_positive_scale_extract_table)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive. dst_positive_code_extract_table = ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrypositive * S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_positive_scale_extract_table) + (dst_positive_extract_table))) /\ (((((exists ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative. ff_h_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative + S (dst_negative_extract_table) = S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_negative_scale_extract_table)) /\ exists ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative. dst_negative_code_extract_table = ff_q_pvs_extract_tableentrynegative * S ((S (dst_index_extract_table)) * dst_negative_scale_extract_table) + (dst_negative_extract_table))) /\ (exists ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue. (((((dst_value_extract_table) = 2 * (ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue) /\ (ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue) = 0) \/ exists ge_signed_half_extract_tableentryvaluedecode. (((dst_value_extract_table) = 2 * ge_signed_half_extract_tableentryvaluedecode + 1 /\ (ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue) = 0) /\ (ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue) = S ge_signed_half_extract_tableentryvaluedecode))) /\ ((dst_positive_extract_table) + ge_balance_negative_extract_tableentryvalue = (dst_negative_extract_table) + ge_balance_positive_extract_tableentryvalue))))))))) -> exists pb pc nb nc. ((F) = (((((pb) + (pc)) * S ((pb) + (pc)) + ((pc) + (pc))) + (((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc)))) * S ((((pb) + (pc)) * S ((pb) + (pc)) + ((pc) + (pc))) + (((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc)))) + ((((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc))) + (((nb) + (nc)) * S ((nb) + (nc)) + ((nc) + (nc))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
A valid finite signed table always supplies its actual nested natural-pair packing.
The unchanged tactic script uses 0 declared prerequisites and contains 13 exact native proof lines.
Public research checkpoint: original HA and independently compiled Lean verified; not Alpha-enrolled, no Alpha checked-use authority; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. The literal dependency-closed bundle is checked by original HA and the independently compiled Lean verifier. Public delivery grants no Alpha checked-use authority or Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–3
02Separate the logical casesL4–8
03Construct an explicit witnessL9–12
04Use earlier factsL13–13
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L13
exact h_witness_witness_witness_witness_left