FP003E

prime_field_negate_table_lookup

Public research checkpoint, not admitted to Alpha or Stable. Alpha v30 remains 3222 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. The on-demand Alpha Lean service does not yet expose these checkpoint theorems; their independently checked literal bundles and unchanged sources are available below.

Public research checkpoint: original HA and independently compiled Lean verified; not Alpha-enrolled, no Alpha checked-use authority; not Stable

Every decoded negate table lookup has its exact unary meaning, including the inverse-at-zero convention.

Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement

forall p B C a v. (forall pft_index_negateunary_lookup_table. (exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tableprefix. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tableprefix + S (pft_index_negateunary_lookup_table) = (p)) -> exists pft_value_negateunary_lookup_table. (((((exists ff_h_pft_negateunary_lookup_tablepointentry. ff_h_pft_negateunary_lookup_tablepointentry + S (pft_value_negateunary_lookup_table) = S ((S (pft_index_negateunary_lookup_table)) * C)) /\ exists ff_q_pft_negateunary_lookup_tablepointentry. B = ff_q_pft_negateunary_lookup_tablepointentry * S ((S (pft_index_negateunary_lookup_table)) * C) + (pft_value_negateunary_lookup_table))) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionleft. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionleft + S (pft_index_negateunary_lookup_table) = (p)) /\ (((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionright. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionright + S (pft_value_negateunary_lookup_table) = (p)) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionresultbound. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionresultbound + S (0) = (p)) /\ ((exists pfa_offset_left_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionresultcongruence pfa_offset_right_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionresultcongruence. ((pft_index_negateunary_lookup_table) + (pft_value_negateunary_lookup_table)) + (p) * pfa_offset_left_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionresultcongruence = (0) + (p) * pfa_offset_right_negateunary_lookup_tablepointvalueadditionresultcongruence))))))))))))) -> (exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_bound. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_bound + S (a) = (p)) -> (((exists ff_h_pft_negateunary_lookup_at. ff_h_pft_negateunary_lookup_at + S (v) = S ((S (a)) * C)) /\ exists ff_q_pft_negateunary_lookup_at. B = ff_q_pft_negateunary_lookup_at * S ((S (a)) * C) + (v))) -> (((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionleft. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionleft + S (a) = (p)) /\ (((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionright. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionright + S (v) = (p)) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionresultbound. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionresultbound + S (0) = (p)) /\ ((exists pfa_offset_left_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionresultcongruence pfa_offset_right_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionresultcongruence. ((a) + (v)) + (p) * pfa_offset_left_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionresultcongruence = (0) + (p) * pfa_offset_right_negateunary_lookup_graphadditionresultcongruence)))))))))

Constructive proof overview

Generated structural guide

Every decoded negate table lookup has its exact unary meaning, including the inverse-at-zero convention.

The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 26 exact native proof lines.

Public research checkpoint: original HA and independently compiled Lean verified; not Alpha-enrolled, no Alpha checked-use authority; not Stable

Proof neighborhood

Direct dependencies

beta_at_unique Alpha theorem; checked-use authorized

Direct dependents

FP003F prime_field_negate_table_reflect

Formal native tactic body

Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. The literal dependency-closed bundle is checked by original HA and the independently compiled Lean verifier. Public delivery grants no Alpha checked-use authority or Stable membership.

Read the argument

Proof checkpoints

26 script commands · 6 reading checkpoints · 2 local claims

This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.

Long local formulas use this family’s existing definitions. Each new abbreviation was expanded back to the identical native formula, including its free-variable context. The original edition is preserved below.

01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–8

Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.

  1. L1
    intro p
  2. L2
    intro B
  3. L3
    intro C
  4. L4
    intro a
  5. L5
    intro v
  6. L6
    intro htable
  7. L7
    intro ha
  8. L8
    intro hat
02Establish hpointL9–12

Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply htable.

  1. L9
    have hpoint : ∃ w. BetaAt(B,C,a,w) ∧ FpAdd(p,a,w,0)Definitions: FpAddBetaAt
  2. L10
    specialize htable (a)
  3. L11
    apply htable
  4. L12
    exact ha
03Separate the logical casesL13–14

Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.

  1. L13
    cases hpoint
  2. L14
    cases hpoint_witness
04Establish heqL15–24

Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta at unique.

  1. L15
    have heq : x = v
  2. L16
    specialize beta_at_unique (B)
  3. L17
    specialize beta_at_unique (C)
  4. L18
    specialize beta_at_unique (a)
  5. L19
    specialize beta_at_unique (x)
  6. L20
    specialize beta_at_unique (v)
  7. L21
    apply beta_at_unique
  8. L22
    exact hpoint_witness_left
  9. L23
    exact hat
  10. L24
    rewrite heq at hpoint_witness_right
05Calculate and transport equalitiesL25–25

Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.

  1. L25
    rewrite heq at hpoint_witness_right
06Use earlier factsL26–26

Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.

  1. L26
    exact hpoint_witness_right

Library-wide reading audit

Original exact command ledger · 26 lines
  1. 0001intro p
  2. 0002intro B
  3. 0003intro C
  4. 0004intro a
  5. 0005intro v
  6. 0006intro htable
  7. 0007intro ha
  8. 0008intro hat
  9. 0009have hpoint : exists w. (((((exists ff_h_pft_negateunary_lookup_pointentry. ff_h_pft_negateunary_lookup_pointentry + S (w) = S ((S (a)) * C)) /\ exists ff_q_pft_negateunary_lookup_pointentry. B = ff_q_pft_negateunary_lookup_pointentry * S ((S (a)) * C) + (w))) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionleft. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionleft + S (a) = (p)) /\ (((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionright. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionright + S (w) = (p)) /\ ((((exists pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionresultbound. pfa_gap_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionresultbound + S (0) = (p)) /\ ((exists pfa_offset_left_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionresultcongruence pfa_offset_right_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionresultcongruence. ((a) + (w)) + (p) * pfa_offset_left_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionresultcongruence = (0) + (p) * pfa_offset_right_negateunary_lookup_pointvalueadditionresultcongruence))))))))))))
  10. 0010specialize htable (a)
  11. 0011apply htable
  12. 0012exact ha
  13. 0013cases hpoint
  14. 0014cases hpoint_witness
  15. 0015have heq : x = v
  16. 0016specialize beta_at_unique (B)
  17. 0017specialize beta_at_unique (C)
  18. 0018specialize beta_at_unique (a)
  19. 0019specialize beta_at_unique (x)
  20. 0020specialize beta_at_unique (v)
  21. 0021apply beta_at_unique
  22. 0022exact hpoint_witness_left
  23. 0023exact hat
  24. 0024rewrite heq at hpoint_witness_right
  25. 0025rewrite heq at hpoint_witness_right
  26. 0026exact hpoint_witness_right