The exact G014 theorem is proved in this research checkpoint for m>1 and genuinely invertible a. Phi counts coprime residues independently of the conclusion. The broader coprime theorem also handles m=1 by congruence, not by asserting that one is a canonical remainder. No multiplicative-order or RSA theorem is claimed. The published atlas and Alpha membership are unchanged.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ m. ∀ b. ∀ c. UnitProductPrefix(m,b,c,0)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 12 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Separate the logical casesL6–6
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L6
exfalso