The exact G014 theorem is proved in this research checkpoint for m>1 and genuinely invertible a. Phi counts coprime residues independently of the conclusion. The broader coprime theorem also handles m=1 by congruence, not by asserting that one is a canonical remainder. No multiplicative-order or RSA theorem is claimed. The published atlas and Alpha membership are unchanged.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ m. ∀ a. ∀ b. Coprime(a,m) → ModEq(m,a,b) → Coprime(b,m)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete tactic proof in conservative notation
All 31 original proof lines are preserved. Only local proposition formulas are abbreviated; every abbreviation has an exact binder-safe expansion check. The linked exact edition contains the unchanged replay script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–5
02Separate the logical casesL6–7
03Establish hpL8–11
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption.
- L8
have hp : Coprime(m · x + a,m)Definitions: Coprime(m · x + a,m)Original native command in the exact edition - L9
specialize totient_coprime_periodic m - L10
specialize totient_coprime_periodic x - L11
specialize totient_coprime_periodic a
04Separate the logical casesL12–12
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L12
cases totient_coprime_periodic
05Use earlier factsL13–14
06Establish heL15–24
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply add comm.
07Calculate and transport equalitiesL25–25
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L25
rewrite he at hp
08Use earlier factsL26–28
09Separate the logical casesL29–29
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L29
cases totient_coprime_periodic
Original defined command ledger · 31 lines
- 0001
intro m - 0002
intro a - 0003
intro b - 0004
intro hc - 0005
intro hmod - 0006
cases hmod - 0007
cases hmod_witness - 0008
have hp : Coprime(m · x + a,m) - 0009
specialize totient_coprime_periodic m - 0010
specialize totient_coprime_periodic x - 0011
specialize totient_coprime_periodic a - 0012
cases totient_coprime_periodic - 0013
apply totient_coprime_periodic_right - 0014
exact hc - 0015
have he : m*x+a=m*x1+b - 0016
trans a+m*x - 0017
specialize add_comm (m*x) - 0018
specialize add_comm (a) - 0019
apply add_comm - 0020
trans b+m*x1 - 0021
exact hmod_witness_witness - 0022
specialize add_comm (b) - 0023
specialize add_comm (m*x1) - 0024
apply add_comm - 0025
rewrite he at hp - 0026
specialize totient_coprime_periodic m - 0027
specialize totient_coprime_periodic x1 - 0028
specialize totient_coprime_periodic b - 0029
cases totient_coprime_periodic - 0030
apply totient_coprime_periodic_left - 0031
exact hp