Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c d e p. forall fms_z_partial. (exists fms_gap_partial_bound. fms_gap_partial_bound + S (fms_z_partial) = (p)) -> ((((((exists fs_h_fms_partial_result. fs_h_fms_partial_result + S (1) = S ((S (fms_z_partial)) * 0)) /\ exists fs_q_fms_partial_result. 0 = fs_q_fms_partial_result * S ((S (fms_z_partial)) * 0) + (1))) -> (exists fms_first_partial fms_second_partial. (((exists fms_gap_partial_left. fms_gap_partial_left + S (fms_first_partial) = (p)) /\ (((exists fs_h_fms_partial_left. fs_h_fms_partial_left + S (1) = S ((S (fms_first_partial)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_fms_partial_left. b = fs_q_fms_partial_left * S ((S (fms_first_partial)) * c) + (1))))) /\ ((((exists fms_gap_partial_right. fms_gap_partial_right + S (fms_second_partial) = (p)) /\ (((exists fs_h_fms_partial_right. fs_h_fms_partial_right + S (1) = S ((S (fms_second_partial)) * e)) /\ exists fs_q_fms_partial_right. d = fs_q_fms_partial_right * S ((S (fms_second_partial)) * e) + (1))))) /\ ((exists fms_gap_partial_cutoff. fms_gap_partial_cutoff + S (fms_second_partial) = (0)) /\ (exists fms_u_partial_congruence fms_v_partial_congruence. (fms_first_partial+fms_second_partial) + (p) * fms_u_partial_congruence = (fms_z_partial) + (p) * fms_v_partial_congruence))))) /\ ((exists fms_first_partial fms_second_partial. (((exists fms_gap_partial_left. fms_gap_partial_left + S (fms_first_partial) = (p)) /\ (((exists fs_h_fms_partial_left. fs_h_fms_partial_left + S (1) = S ((S (fms_first_partial)) * c)) /\ exists fs_q_fms_partial_left. b = fs_q_fms_partial_left * S ((S (fms_first_partial)) * c) + (1))))) /\ ((((exists fms_gap_partial_right. fms_gap_partial_right + S (fms_second_partial) = (p)) /\ (((exists fs_h_fms_partial_right. fs_h_fms_partial_right + S (1) = S ((S (fms_second_partial)) * e)) /\ exists fs_q_fms_partial_right. d = fs_q_fms_partial_right * S ((S (fms_second_partial)) * e) + (1))))) /\ ((exists fms_gap_partial_cutoff. fms_gap_partial_cutoff + S (fms_second_partial) = (0)) /\ (exists fms_u_partial_congruence fms_v_partial_congruence. (fms_first_partial+fms_second_partial) + (p) * fms_u_partial_congruence = (fms_z_partial) + (p) * fms_v_partial_congruence)))) -> (((exists fs_h_fms_partial_result. fs_h_fms_partial_result + S (1) = S ((S (fms_z_partial)) * 0)) /\ exists fs_q_fms_partial_result. 0 = fs_q_fms_partial_result * S ((S (fms_z_partial)) * 0) + (1))))))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
The actual empty code is exactly the sumset restricted to the empty second-coordinate prefix.
The unchanged tactic script uses 4 declared prerequisites and contains 33 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v27 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
CD002A finite_beta_zero_code CD0023 finite_bit_zero_nonmember add_eq_zero_right Stable theorem; checked-use authorized succ_ne_zero Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (2)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–7
02Separate the logical casesL8–8
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L8
split
03Fix variables and assumptionsL9–9
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L9
intro hmember
04Separate the logical casesL10–10
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L10
exfalso
05Use earlier factsL11–17
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
06Fix variables and assumptionsL18–18
Work with arbitrary variables or the premises of the current implication.
- L18
intro hw
07Separate the logical casesL19–25
08Establish hzeroL26–33
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply add eq zero right.
Original exact command ledger · 33 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro d - 0004
intro e - 0005
intro p - 0006
intro z - 0007
intro hz - 0008
split - 0009
intro hmember - 0010
exfalso - 0011
specialize finite_bit_zero_nonmember 0 - 0012
specialize finite_bit_zero_nonmember 0 - 0013
specialize finite_bit_zero_nonmember z - 0014
apply finite_bit_zero_nonmember - 0015
specialize finite_beta_zero_code z - 0016
apply finite_beta_zero_code - 0017
exact hmember - 0018
intro hw - 0019
cases hw - 0020
cases hw_witness - 0021
cases hw_witness_witness - 0022
cases hw_witness_witness_right - 0023
cases hw_witness_witness_right_right - 0024
cases hw_witness_witness_right_right_left - 0025
exfalso - 0026
have hzero : S x1=0 - 0027
specialize add_eq_zero_right x2 - 0028
specialize add_eq_zero_right S x1 - 0029
apply add_eq_zero_right - 0030
exact hw_witness_witness_right_right_left_witness - 0031
specialize succ_ne_zero x1 - 0032
apply succ_ne_zero - 0033
exact hzero