Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
G101 and G102 were OPEN when these BitLen foundations were first admitted in Alpha v22. Both are now CLOSED in Alpha v23: complete canonical exponent digits and both exact logarithmic execution bounds are proved.
Exact theorem in conservative defined notation
∀ e. ∀ f. ∀ p. ∀ q. Lt(e,f) → PowTwo(e,p) → PowTwo(f,q) → Lt(p,q)
Every linked abbreviation expands hygienically to the identical original native formula.
Definition DAG
Actual proof prerequisites
Complete unchanged native tactic proof
All 33 lines are the exact independently kernel-checked original script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (3)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–7
02Establish hnextL8–10
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption.
03Separate the logical casesL11–11
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L11
cases hnext
04Establish hfirstL12–18
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply binary power two strict growth.
05Establish hsecondL19–28
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply binary power two exponent monotone.
- L19
have hsecond : exists gap. gap + x = q - L20
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone (S e) - L21
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone f - L22
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone x - L23
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone q - L24
apply binary_power_two_exponent_monotone - L25
exact horder - L26
exact hnext_witness - L27
exact hq - L28
specialize lt_of_lt_of_le p
Original defined command ledger · 33 lines
- 0001
intro e - 0002
intro f - 0003
intro p - 0004
intro q - 0005
intro horder - 0006
intro hp - 0007
intro hq - 0008
have hnext : exists z. (exists pa_b_bl_strict_next pa_c_bl_strict_next. ((forall pa_i_bl_strict_next_repeat. (exists pa_lt_bl_strict_next_repeat_bound. pa_lt_bl_strict_next_repeat_bound + S pa_i_bl_strict_next_repeat = S e) -> (((exists pa_h_bl_strict_next_repeat_decoded. pa_h_bl_strict_next_repeat_decoded + S (2) = S ((S (pa_i_bl_strict_next_repeat)) * pa_c_bl_strict_next)) /\ exists pa_q_bl_strict_next_repeat_decoded. pa_b_bl_strict_next = pa_q_bl_strict_next_repeat_decoded * S ((S (pa_i_bl_strict_next_repeat)) * pa_c_bl_strict_next) + (2)))) /\ (exists pa_u_bl_strict_next_product pa_v_bl_strict_next_product. ((((exists pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_start. pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_start + S (1) = S ((S (0)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product)) /\ exists pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_start. pa_u_bl_strict_next_product = pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_start * S ((S (0)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product) + (1))) /\ ((((exists pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_terminal. pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_terminal + S (z) = S ((S (S e)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product)) /\ exists pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_terminal. pa_u_bl_strict_next_product = pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_terminal * S ((S (S e)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product) + (z))) /\ forall pa_i_bl_strict_next_product. (exists pa_lt_bl_strict_next_product_bound. pa_lt_bl_strict_next_product_bound + S pa_i_bl_strict_next_product = S e) -> exists pa_p_bl_strict_next_product pa_r_bl_strict_next_product pa_s_bl_strict_next_product. ((((exists pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_factor. pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_factor + S (pa_p_bl_strict_next_product) = S ((S (pa_i_bl_strict_next_product)) * pa_c_bl_strict_next)) /\ exists pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_factor. pa_b_bl_strict_next = pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_factor * S ((S (pa_i_bl_strict_next_product)) * pa_c_bl_strict_next) + (pa_p_bl_strict_next_product))) /\ ((((exists pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_partial. pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_partial + S (pa_r_bl_strict_next_product) = S ((S (pa_i_bl_strict_next_product)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product)) /\ exists pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_partial. pa_u_bl_strict_next_product = pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_partial * S ((S (pa_i_bl_strict_next_product)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product) + (pa_r_bl_strict_next_product))) /\ ((((exists pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_successor. pa_h_bl_strict_next_product_successor + S (pa_s_bl_strict_next_product) = S ((S (S pa_i_bl_strict_next_product)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product)) /\ exists pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_successor. pa_u_bl_strict_next_product = pa_q_bl_strict_next_product_successor * S ((S (S pa_i_bl_strict_next_product)) * pa_v_bl_strict_next_product) + (pa_s_bl_strict_next_product))) /\ pa_s_bl_strict_next_product = pa_r_bl_strict_next_product * pa_p_bl_strict_next_product)))))))) - 0009
specialize binary_power_two_exists (S e) - 0010
exact binary_power_two_exists - 0011
cases hnext - 0012
have hfirst : exists gap. gap + S p = x - 0013
specialize binary_power_two_strict_growth e - 0014
specialize binary_power_two_strict_growth p - 0015
specialize binary_power_two_strict_growth x - 0016
apply binary_power_two_strict_growth - 0017
exact hp - 0018
exact hnext_witness - 0019
have hsecond : exists gap. gap + x = q - 0020
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone (S e) - 0021
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone f - 0022
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone x - 0023
specialize binary_power_two_exponent_monotone q - 0024
apply binary_power_two_exponent_monotone - 0025
exact horder - 0026
exact hnext_witness - 0027
exact hq - 0028
specialize lt_of_lt_of_le p - 0029
specialize lt_of_lt_of_le x - 0030
specialize lt_of_lt_of_le q - 0031
apply lt_of_lt_of_le - 0032
exact hfirst - 0033
exact hsecond