Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c l. (forall ff_index_be_bd_old ff_digit_be_bd_old. (exists ff_lt_be_bd_old_bound. ff_lt_be_bd_old_bound + S ff_index_be_bd_old = l) -> (((exists ff_h_be_bd_old_digit. ff_h_be_bd_old_digit + S (ff_digit_be_bd_old) = S ((S (ff_index_be_bd_old)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_be_bd_old_digit. b = ff_q_be_bd_old_digit * S ((S (ff_index_be_bd_old)) * c) + (ff_digit_be_bd_old))) -> (ff_digit_be_bd_old = 0 \/ ff_digit_be_bd_old = 1)) -> (forall ff_i_bd_all_bits. (exists ff_lt_bd_all_bits_bound. ff_lt_bd_all_bits_bound + S ff_i_bd_all_bits = l) -> exists ff_bit_bd_all_bits. ((((exists ff_h_bd_all_bits_decoded. ff_h_bd_all_bits_decoded + S (ff_bit_bd_all_bits) = S ((S (ff_i_bd_all_bits)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_bd_all_bits_decoded. b = ff_q_bd_all_bits_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_bd_all_bits)) * c) + (ff_bit_bd_all_bits))) /\ (ff_bit_bd_all_bits = 0 \/ ff_bit_bd_all_bits = 1)))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Every universal genuine digit-prefix invariant yields actual beta-decoded zero-or-one witnesses at every position.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 20 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v23 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
beta_at_exists Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Establish hentryL7–11
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption.
- L7
have hentry : exists digit. (((exists ff_h_bd_all_bits_entry. ff_h_bd_all_bits_entry + S (digit) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_bd_all_bits_entry. b = ff_q_bd_all_bits_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (digit))) - L8
specialize beta_at_exists b - L9
specialize beta_at_exists c - L10
specialize beta_at_exists i - L11
exact beta_at_exists
03Separate the logical casesL12–12
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L12
cases hentry
04Construct an explicit witnessL13–13
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L13
exists x
05Separate the logical casesL14–14
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L14
split
Original exact command ledger · 20 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro l - 0004
intro hdigits - 0005
intro i - 0006
intro hbound - 0007
have hentry : exists digit. (((exists ff_h_bd_all_bits_entry. ff_h_bd_all_bits_entry + S (digit) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_bd_all_bits_entry. b = ff_q_bd_all_bits_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (digit))) - 0008
specialize beta_at_exists b - 0009
specialize beta_at_exists c - 0010
specialize beta_at_exists i - 0011
exact beta_at_exists - 0012
cases hentry - 0013
exists x - 0014
split - 0015
exact hentry_witness - 0016
specialize hdigits i - 0017
specialize hdigits x - 0018
apply hdigits - 0019
exact hbound - 0020
exact hentry_witness
Separate complete second-wave branches: Full T13 proof · Alpha v27.