Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded PA statement
forall p. ((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_bpvl_prime frm_prime_right_bpvl_prime. p = frm_prime_left_bpvl_prime * frm_prime_right_bpvl_prime -> frm_prime_left_bpvl_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_bpvl_prime = 1)) -> (exists bpvl_gap_prime_two. bpvl_gap_prime_two + (2) = (p))Structural proof guide
Every prime is at least two in witness-defined order.
Direct prerequisites: prime_is_succ_succ. The authored body proceeds by case analysis (1), intermediate claims (1), equality transport (3).
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
Direct dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are hypotheses of the historical Alpha-v12 body receipt. The complete historical Alpha-v18 proof bundle independently checks every dependency; current Alpha v25 preserves that checked theorem use without changing Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–2
02Establish hshapeL3–6
03Separate the logical casesL7–7
Follow the explicit conjunction, disjunction, witness, or contradiction step recorded below.
- L7
cases hshape
04Construct an explicit witnessL8–8
Supply the displayed value, then prove that it has the required property.
- L8
exists x
05Calculate and transport equalitiesL9–14
06Use earlier factsL15–15
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L15
exact hshape_witness