Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Statement with defined notation
∀ b. ∀ c. ∀ l. ∀ sl. sl = S l → AllBits(b,c,sl) → ∃ x. BetaAt(b,c,l,x) ∧ (x = 0 ∨ x = 1)Every purple notation token opens its conservative definition. Expanding the displayed statement recovers the exact first-order Peano-arithmetic formula checked by the unchanged kernel.
Definitions used by this theorem
In the theorem statement
2 occurrences
In local proof propositions
0 occurrences
Exact expanded native-PA statement
forall b c l sl. sl = S l -> (forall ff_i_successor. (exists ff_lt_successor_bound. ff_lt_successor_bound + S ff_i_successor = sl) -> exists ff_bit_successor. ((((exists ff_h_successor_decoded. ff_h_successor_decoded + S (ff_bit_successor) = S ((S (ff_i_successor)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_successor_decoded. b = ff_q_successor_decoded * S ((S (ff_i_successor)) * c) + (ff_bit_successor))) /\ (ff_bit_successor = 0 \/ ff_bit_successor = 1))) -> exists a. ((((exists ff_h_last. ff_h_last + S (a) = S ((S (l)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_last. b = ff_q_last * S ((S (l)) * c) + (a))) /\ (a = 0 \/ a = 1))Proof neighborhood
Direct theorem prerequisites
Direct theorem dependents
Definition-aware tactic body
Only local propositions introduced by have or suffices are compacted. Every changed line has an exact-AST conservative-expansion receipt; the kernel still receives the immutable original tactic script.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
Named ingredients (1)
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–6
02Calculate and transport equalitiesL7–7
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L7
rewrite hsl at hbits