Current library: Alpha v34, 4,223 checked-use theorems; Stable remains 432. Historical first admissions, original proof editions, and non-admitted aliases are preserved. Exact original first-admission records.
Exact expanded first-order arithmetic statement
forall b c l i p. (forall ftsf_index_fsat_entry_primes. (exists ftsf_gap_fsat_entry_primes_bound. ftsf_gap_fsat_entry_primes_bound + S ftsf_index_fsat_entry_primes = (l)) -> exists ftsf_factor_fsat_entry_primes. ((((exists ff_h_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_entry. ff_h_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_entry + S (ftsf_factor_fsat_entry_primes) = S ((S (ftsf_index_fsat_entry_primes)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_entry. b = ff_q_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_entry * S ((S (ftsf_index_fsat_entry_primes)) * c) + (ftsf_factor_fsat_entry_primes))) /\ ((~(ftsf_factor_fsat_entry_primes = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_prime frm_prime_right_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_prime. ftsf_factor_fsat_entry_primes = frm_prime_left_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_prime * frm_prime_right_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_prime -> frm_prime_left_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_ftsf_fsat_entry_primes_prime = 1)))) -> (exists pfp_gap_entry_bound. pfp_gap_entry_bound + S (i) = (l)) -> (((exists ff_h_pfp_entry. ff_h_pfp_entry + S (p) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_entry. b = ff_q_pfp_entry * S ((S (i)) * c) + (p))) -> ((~(p = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_prime frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_prime. p = frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_prime * frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_prime -> frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_prime = 1))Constructive proof overview
Generated structural guide
Every actual decoded entry of an all-prime prefix is prime, without a supplied choice of matching factor.
The unchanged tactic script uses 1 declared prerequisite and contains 26 exact native proof lines.
Alpha v34 checked-use · first admitted v28 · independently kernel and Lean verified; not Stable
Proof neighborhood
Direct dependencies
beta_at_unique Stable theorem; checked-use authorizedDirect dependents
Formal native tactic body
Dependencies are introduced as named hypotheses before line 1. Local theorem links identify exact declared prerequisites. This exact body belongs to a complete independently kernel-checked constructive proof bundle and has Alpha checked-use authority; it does not imply Stable membership.
Read the argument
Proof checkpoints
This is a reading aid, not a new proof or a proof-tree certificate. Checkpoint groups are consecutive commands, not inferred branch boundaries. Every step links to the preserved script.
01Fix variables and assumptionsL1–8
02Establish hexL9–12
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply hprimes.
- L9
have hex : exists q. (((exists ff_h_pfp_entry_chosen. ff_h_pfp_entry_chosen + S (q) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_entry_chosen. b = ff_q_pfp_entry_chosen * S ((S (i)) * c) + (q))) /\ ((~(q = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_chosen_prime frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_chosen_prime. q = frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_chosen_prime * frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_chosen_prime -> frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_chosen_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_chosen_prime = 1)) - L10
specialize hprimes (i) - L11
apply hprimes - L12
exact hi
03Separate the logical casesL13–14
04Establish heqL15–24
Establish this local claim before using it. It is not an additional assumption. The following proof commands apply beta at unique.
05Calculate and transport equalitiesL25–25
Carry out the recorded arithmetic or equality steps; inspect the exact commands for their direction and premises.
- L25
rewrite heq
06Use earlier factsL26–26
Instantiate or apply named facts and discharge the corresponding proof obligations.
- L26
exact hex_witness_right
Original exact command ledger · 26 lines
- 0001
intro b - 0002
intro c - 0003
intro l - 0004
intro i - 0005
intro p - 0006
intro hprimes - 0007
intro hi - 0008
intro hp - 0009
have hex : exists q. (((exists ff_h_pfp_entry_chosen. ff_h_pfp_entry_chosen + S (q) = S ((S (i)) * c)) /\ exists ff_q_pfp_entry_chosen. b = ff_q_pfp_entry_chosen * S ((S (i)) * c) + (q))) /\ ((~(q = 1) /\ forall frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_chosen_prime frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_chosen_prime. q = frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_chosen_prime * frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_chosen_prime -> frm_prime_left_pfp_entry_chosen_prime = 1 \/ frm_prime_right_pfp_entry_chosen_prime = 1)) - 0010
specialize hprimes (i) - 0011
apply hprimes - 0012
exact hi - 0013
cases hex - 0014
cases hex_witness - 0015
have heq : p = x - 0016
specialize beta_at_unique (b) - 0017
specialize beta_at_unique (c) - 0018
specialize beta_at_unique (i) - 0019
specialize beta_at_unique (p) - 0020
specialize beta_at_unique (x) - 0021
apply beta_at_unique - 0022
exact hp - 0023
exact hex_witness_left - 0024
rewrite heq - 0025
rewrite heq - 0026
exact hex_witness_right